Proof, in the format the buyer already uses
When a public-sector buyer asks for accessibility evidence, they ask for a VPAT, and what they want is an Accessibility Conformance Report: a criterion-by-criterion statement of how your product supports WCAG, on the template their procurement office knows how to read. A good one is an asset in every evaluation you enter. A bad one — self-declared, all supports, no remarks — is quietly fatal, because evaluators have read enough of them to know.
We produce reports that survive scrutiny because they are the output of a real evaluation: automated scanning, manual review of every applicable criterion, and assistive-technology testing of the journeys a user actually takes. The evaluation methods are stated in the report, the remarks are specific, and the levels of support are ones you can repeat in a demonstration.
A report that gets better
The first report is rarely all green, and it should not pretend to be. What buyers reward is trajectory: dated remarks, a roadmap, and a next edition that shows the roadmap was real. We pair the report with a ranked list of the criteria that do not yet pass, and, where you want it, with the remediation that closes them before the next procurement cycle.